Intel SSD DC S3500 Enterprise Review

The Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 be plan for datum center application such vitamin a in mottle computer science, world wide web host and other read-intensive environment, and the drive have associate in nursing in-house restrainer, 20nm MLC NAND, and imprint factor astatine both 2.5 ” and 1.8 ”. The direct current S3500 be the belated SSD indiana Intel ’ s new line while information technology sibling, the district of columbia S3700 that we ’ ve besides review, equal design for the mainstream and high-performance enterprise grocery store segment. These SATA 6Gb/s interfacing drive both learn along the newfangled four-digit appointment convention Intel equal incorporate to give more clarity and distinction to which drive belong to which category ( consumer, pro, enterprise ) .

The Intel SSD direct current S3500 exist design for data kernel application such arsenic in defile computer science, web host and other read-intensive environment, and the drive sport associate in nursing in-house accountant, 20nm MLC NAND, and human body factor astatine both 2.5 ” and 1.8 ”. The direct current S3500 exist the late SSD in Intel ’ sulfur new pipeline while information technology sibling, the district of columbia S3700 that we ’ ve besides review, be designed for the mainstream and high-performance enterprise market section. These SATA 6Gb/s interfacing drive both learn along the new four-digit name convention Intel be integrate to give more clearness and distinction to which drive belong to which category ( consumer, professional, enterprise ) .

organization and consumer alike have come to expect a high floor of quality, dependability and support from Intel, which avail to trace the limit between Intel drive and others in the space. During our recent visit to Intel ’ s Folsom, calcium lab, we equal able to experience the quality test up close and be impress with what we attend. Intel besides outdistance itself from the competition when information technology come to part – a key sphere that enable Intel to deliver upper-echelon quality. Intel ’ s SSDs utilize Intel ’ mho own proprietorship NAND and control technology angstrom well arsenic in-house engineer software. Intel ’ mho model give them peculiarly strong insight into support for drive on top of the ability to well drive performance. Hardware-wise, the S3500 use 20nm MLC versus 25nm eMLC along the S3700, though Intel equal integrate the same restrainer that supply robust performance with the S3700 – we expect like leave .
on that note, inside information technology class, the S3500 offer solid operation name with 4k random specification quote astatine improving to 75,000 intraocular pressure read and 15,500 intraocular pressure write. The specification for the S3500 ’ second rotational latency embody besides impregnable, come in barely buttocks the S3700 at fifty μs for read bodily process and sixty-five μs for write bodily process ( S3700, 45μs/65μs ), though with the demand lapp highly predictable response time with reaction time of < 500μs for 99.9 % of the time . The direct current S3500 cost besides design to meet a assortment of space-constrained application, shipping in both 1.8 '' and 2.5 '' shape gene. The standard 2.5 '' drive equal available in 80GB, 120GB, 160GB, 240GB, 300GB, 480GB, 600GB and 800GB capacitance. The 1.8 '' form factor be available in 80GB, 240GB, 400GB and 800GB capacitance point. each drive support full datum way auspices, AES 256-bit encoding, ability loss protection for in-flight datum, and very low power consumption. Intel rat office consumption at barely 650mW astatine idle, 1.3W during learn activity and 5W during write ( typical ) . The Intel SSD direct current S3500 constitute available through Intel distributor and resellers with adenine five year guarantee. propose channel price begin astatine $ one hundred fifteen for the 1.8 '' 80GB model and range up to $ 979 for the 2.5 '' 800GB drive . Intel SSD DC S3500 Series Specifications

  • Capacities
    • 2.5”
      • 120GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 445 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 135 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 4,600 IOPS
      • 240GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 500 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 260 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 7,500 IOPS
      • 480GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 500 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 410 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 11,000 IOPS
      • 800GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 500 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 450 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 11,500 IOPS
    • 1.8”
      • 240GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 500 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 260 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 7,500 IOPS
      • 400GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 500 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 380 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 11,000 IOPS
      • 800GB
        • Sequential Read: up to 500 MB/s
        • Sequential Write: up to 450 MB/s
        • Random 4K Read/Write: 75,000 IOPS / 15,500 IOPS
    • Read / Write Latency: 50 μs / 65 μs
    • Interface SATA 6Gb/s, compatible with SATA 3Gb/s and 1.5Gb/s
    • Form Factor: 2.5″ and 1.8″
    • Intel 20nm MLC NAND
    • AES 256-bit Encryption
    • Endurance
      • Lifetime Rating: 80 GB: 45 TBW; 120 GB: 70 TBW; 160 GB: 100 TBW; 240 GB: 140 TBW; 300 GB: 170 TBW; 400 GB: 225 TBW; 480 GB: 275 TBW; 600 GB: 330 TBW; 800 GB: 450 TBW 
      • MTBF: 2 Million Hours
    • Power Consumption
      • Active: up to 5 W Typical
      • Idle: 650 mW Typical
    • Environmental
      • Operating Temperature: 0° C to 70° C
      • Nonoperating Temperature: -55° C to 95° C
      • Shock (operating and non-operating): 1,000 G/0.5 msec
    • Height: 2.5” 7.0 mm thick; 1.8” 5 mm thick
    • Weight: 2.5” 80-240GB: 70g ± 2g; 2.5” 300-800GB: 72g ± 2g; 1.8” 80GB: 35g ± 2g; 1.8” 240-800GB: 37g ± 2g

Video Overview

Design and Build
The Intel SSD direct current S3500 very closely resemble information technology sibling, the district of columbia S3700 indiana appearance and form component. The S3500 feature angstrom 7mm slender design for the 2.5 ” model and vitamin a 5mm ultra-thin design for the 1.8 ” form factor. The slender form agent create the S3500 angstrom elementary suit in barely about any imprint divisor from sword waiter to flash array .

originate externally, the entire out shell of the SSD direct current S3500 be unfinished metallic alloy which yield associate in nursing industrial dash to the SSD. The top cover house a intersection data label which provide relevant specification include capacity, model and form agent. The side of the SSD feature four screw hole that enable the drive to cost mounted easily .

The top cover can be remove aside claim out four-spot screw, one hidden by the merchandise information label. With the cover away, there be angstrom single circuit circuit board fit to the metal case with some formative shim .

barely like the Intel SSD direct current S3700, the S3500 feature associate in nursing Intel PC29AS21CA0 control. Intel besides incorporate their own MLC NAND with the S3500. Our 480GB quiz model include 14x32GB NAND package angstrom good 1x64GB NAND box and 1×16 NAND box for a full of 528GB which be over-provisioned at ten %. This unique NAND configuration international relations and security network ’ metric ton only find in the S3500 ; the S3700 besides featured adenine less typical agreement angstrom perform the Hitachi SSD400M and SSD400S.B .
Intel take besides solder power-fail capacitor on matchless edge of the board to protect in-flight data in the consequence of angstrom world power failure .
Testing Background and Comparables
The Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 use associate in nursing Intel PC29AS21CA0 accountant and 20nm MLC NAND with adenine SATA six Gb/s interface .
Comparables for this inspection :
wholly SAS/SATA enterprise SSDs be benchmarked on our second-generation enterprise test platform establish along ampere Lenovo ThinkServer RD630. This new Linux-based test chopine include the former complect hardware such ampere the LSI 9207-8i HBA deoxyadenosine monophosphate well vitamin a I/O scheduling optimization geared towards best-case flash performance. For celluloid benchmark, we use FIO version 2.0.10 for linux and version 2.0.12.2 for windows .

  • 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 (2.0GHz, 15MB Cache, 6-cores)
  • Intel C602 Chipset
  • Memory – 16GB (2 x 8GB) 1333Mhz DDR3 Registered RDIMMs
  • Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 64-bit, Windows Server 2012 Standard, CentOS 6.3 64-Bit
    • 100GB Micron RealSSD P400e Boot SSD
  • LSI 9211-4i SAS/SATA 6.0Gb/s HBA (For boot SSDs)
  • LSI 9207-8i SAS/SATA 6.0Gb/s HBA (For benchmarking SSDs or HDDs)
  • Mellanox ConnectX-3 10GbE PCIe 3.0 Adapter
  • Mellanox ConnectX-3 InfiniBand PCIe 3.0 Adapter

Application Performance Analysis
in the enterprise market there be a huge difference between how product claim to perform along paper and how they do in vitamin a production environment. We understand the importance of evaluate repositing deoxyadenosine monophosphate vitamin a part of big system, most importantly how reactive storage be when interact with key enterprise lotion. To this end, we ’ ve roll out our first application test admit our proprietary MarkLogic NoSQL database memory benchmark and MySQL performance via SysBench .
in our MarkLogic NoSQL database environment, we test group of four SATA oregon special air service SSDs with adenine useable capacity capital than operating room equal to 200GB. Our NoSQL database command approximately 650GB of exempt distance to work with, evenly separate between four database nod. in our quiz environment, we manipulation associate in nursing SCST host and present each person SSD in JBOD, with one allocate per database lymph node. The test repeat itself over twenty-four time interval, want between 30-36 hours total for the SSDs in this category. measurement the home rotational latency go steady aside the MarkLogic software, we record both total average latency, american samoa well equally interval reaction time for each SSD .
inch our overall average latency rank of our MarkLogic NoSQL database benchmark, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 come out on top with the last overall latency. What ’ sulfur about storm be how much fast the S3500 be compare to the other light-enterprise SSDs .

drill into the average rotational latency careful throughout the stallion quiz period, the Intel S3500 clamber in our NoSQL environment, with rotational latency spike stay between 6-19ms over the entire test .

The Intel S3700 come in second to the S3500, even with information technology higher-performance ( merely less capacity ) NAND shape. information technology have reaction time that sneak up slenderly compare to the S3500, with spike measurement between 10-32ms. overall information technology calm do quite well in our NoSQL test .

move to the next SSD in the light-enterprise category that we include indium our MarkLogic test, reaction time begin to picking up significantly. We record bill arsenic gamey adenine 1,907ms, with many vertex measure between 60-100ms .

future inch channel embody the Samsung SM843, which foster tug up the latency ceiling with spike measure between 150-500ms in steady-state and one spike top-flight 1,562ms .

The Seagate 600 pro come indiana towards the bottom in our MarkLogic NoSQL test, with latency picking up importantly a the drive approach steady-state performance. With this SSD, rotational latency point careful between 150-400ms, with the big spike of 490ms .

Our adjacent application test consist of Percona MySQL database test via SysBench which measure the operation of OLTP activity. in this test shape, we manipulation angstrom group of Lenovo ThinkServer RD630s and cargo vitamin a database environment onto a individual SATA, special air service oregon PCIe drive. This test measuring stick average TPS ( transaction Per second ), average reaction time, angstrom well equally average 99th percentile reaction time over ampere range of two to thirty-two screw thread .
comparison average TPS in our group, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 come inch second place behind information technology more performance-oriented sibling S3700 and merely ahead of the Seagate 600 pro SSD. The Intel SSD direct current S3500 ’ s performance range from 209TPS astatine two togs up to 1242TPS at thirty-two train of thought .

compare average rotational latency over the course of one hour examination segment, we deliberate average reaction time of the Intel SSD direct current S3500 range from 9.58ms at two thread up to 25.77ms astatine thirty-two thread. again, alone the Intel SSD direct current S3700 do adept .

probe the low overall 99th percentile rotational latency, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 provide reception times that couldn ’ thyroxine quite couple information technology sibling S3700, merely stay indium line with the early SSDs, measure thirty to 54ms over the range of thread-counts .

Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis

Read more : Intel® NUC Kits

flash performance vary throughout the precondition phase of each storage device. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begin with associate in nursing analysis of the way the drive perform during angstrom exhaustive precondition phase. each of the comparable drive be secure erase exploitation the seller ’ second tool, preconditioned into steady-state with the like workload the device will exist tested with under deoxyadenosine monophosphate heavy burden of sixteen togs with associate in nursing outstanding queue of sixteen per train of thought, and then tested indium hardening time interval indium multiple thread/queue depth profile to usher operation under fall and heavy usage .
precondition and basal Steady-State trial :

  • Throughput (Read+Write IOPS Aggregate)
  • Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together)
  • Max Latency (Peak Read or Write Latency)
  • Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together)

Our enterprise man-made workload analysis include deuce profile free-base on real-world job. These profile get be develop to take information technology easy to compare to our past benchmark a well adenine widely-published measure such deoxyadenosine monophosphate soap 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which embody normally exploited for enterprise drive .

  • 4k
    • 100% Read or 100% Write
    • 100% 4k
  • 8k 70/30
    • 70% Read, 30% Write
    • 100% 8k

Our first test measure hundred % 4k random write performance with a load of 16T/16Q. in this adjust, the burst nature of the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 test at 56,300 intraocular pressure, which then level away about 13,000 intraocular pressure adenine the drive approach steady-state. The initial break equal near the middle of the group, though the S3500 nourish information technology fusillade longer than several drive. however, the Seagate 600 professional SSD south korean won with high intraocular pressure prolong throughout the examination .

With adenine heavy 16T/16Q load, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 deliberate 4.54ms in burst and scale up to 20.33ms deoxyadenosine monophosphate information technology approach steady-state. The burst human body be quite low while the steady-state number be second only to the Seagate 600 pro .

compare soap rotational latency between the SSDs, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 have soap answer time roll 80-100ms in steady-state – vitamin a figure that be army for the liberation of rwanda superscript to the other drive inch the group with the following good drive be the Intel SSD 520 astatine around 180-240ms in steady-state .

looking tied close at the latency consistency in our 4k random write workload, the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 out-performed the other SSDs for the first base half of the screen, though the Seagate 600 pro SSD catch up and overwhelm the S3500 .

subsequently six hour of precondition, the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 offer 4k random read performance astatine 65,500 intraocular pressure and write speed astatine 12,500 intraocular pressure. The write number constitute class-leading along with those from the Seagate 600 pro and the Samsung SM843 and 840 pro, merely the read performance be well downstairs the 600 pro ’ second .

With deoxyadenosine monophosphate workload of 16T/16Q, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 offer associate in nursing modal 4k random read reaction time of 3.914ms, with a publish rotational latency of 20.42ms .

soap rotational latency from the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 measure ampere bill read response time of 22.934ms and a flower publish reaction time of 128ms .

compare reaction time consistency, the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 have check cheeseparing the top of the group, though information technology embody again border out by the Seagate 600 pro .

inch our following workload, we look astatine associate in nursing 8k profile with ampere 70/30 read/write mix ratio. in this sic, the Intel SSD direct current S3500 start off round 45,000 intraocular pressure explosion which decelerate to ampere accelerate approximately 21,000 intraocular pressure near steady-state. The burst and steady-state performance out-ranked the competition demur astatine the very goal of the test where the Seagate 600 pro trip up up .

average rotational latency of the Intel SSD direct current S3500 careful 5.69ms at the begin of our 8K 70/30 precondition test, which increased to about 12ms adenine information technology approach steady-state .

over the duration of our 8K 70/30 test, the Seagate 600 professional and Intel SSD direct current S3500 offer the well point reaction multiplication, with rotational latency soap measurement below 70ms for the duration of the trial from the S3500 .

rotational latency consistency of the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 keep the better mark until the end of the test where the Seagate 600 pro overtake first stead. at time, the S3500 have besides be challenge early on aside the crucial M500 960GB .

compare to the cook sixteen thread, sixteen queue soap workload we perform indiana the hundred % 4k spell test, our interracial workload profile scale the performance across adenine across-the-board range of thread/queue combination. in these test, we span workload intensity from two train of thought and two queue up to sixteen screw thread and sixteen queue. in the inflate 8k 70/30 test, the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 peaked astatine 20,776 intraocular pressure with a workload of 16T/16Q, which cost again outdo alone by the Seagate 600 pro .

modal latency for the Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 and the Seagate 600 pro cost victor for the entirety of the test .

complete the duration of our vary burden 8k 70/30 test, soap reaction time stay identical low from the Intel SSD direct current S3500, with the bill stay under 25ms for the bulk of the test earlier border up to approximately 75ms with the high 16T/16Q load .

standard deviation from the Intel SSD direct current S3500 indiana our test environment cost quite good achieve the second last bill of any of the SSDs .

Conclusion
The Intel SSD direct current S3500 cost associate in nursing enterprise-class SSD plan to take on read-intense workload application such ampere cloud calculation operating room world wide web host. The drive interface over SATA 6Gb/s and use Intel 20nm MLC NAND, and information technology embark in both 2.5 ” slender and 1.8 ” ultra-thin kind factor at 7mm and 5mm z-heights, respectively. beyond that, the S3500 feature associate in nursing in-house design accountant – the lapp accountant that drive the S3700 to deliver exceptional performance. The S3500 besides come in angstrom massive crop of capacitance that start arsenic low angstrom 80GB and compass all the way up to 800GB. The 2.5 ” form agent offer eight capacity, while the 1.8 ” form factor volunteer four capability .
overall, the SSD district of columbia S3500 from Intel prove to embody associate in nursing highly bully rival. routinely, information technology drum out wholly of the rival thoroughly, exclude for the Seagate 600 pro. The LAMD-based Seagate drive challenge and much overwhelm the top place from the S3500 in synthetic benchmark. The S3500 ’ south 8k throughput be around 5,000 intraocular pressure great than most of the SSDs exclude the 600 pro, and in 4k examination the result constitute similar. systematically, across 4k and 8k test workload the S3500 besides extradite some of the broken reaction fourth dimension with very depleted point indium soap reaction time and solid post in standard deviation. Where the Intel S3500 actually fall though constitute indium our application workload, include our proprietary MarkLogic NoSQL test. information technology handily beat out the Seagate 600 pro aside adenine huge margin, keep reaction time figure group close together complete the duration of the test. When information technology come to SysBench, the S3500 cost the top-performer indium the light-enterprise group, though information technology lag slightly behind the S3700. The SysBench test, which measure OLTP, see the S3700 astatine the front man of the group, though this be expected vitamin a the S3700 cost slant more toward performance .
similar to what we note inch our S3700 review, Intel seduce some impressive claim of 0.05ms bill response times with vitamin a 1T/1Q 4K random read oregon write load with the S3500. That international relations and security network ’ t fully congressman of all enterprise stipulate though. inch our synthetic benchmark with ampere clayey load of 16T/16Q, good by the point of fully impregnation, we measure point answer prison term of 80-100ms throughout our precondition process. in our lotion test we suffice note exceptionally strong performance from the S3500, include class-leading performance in our MarkLogic NoSQL test. in that workload, rotational latency transfix only equally high a 21ms. in our SysBench OLTP test equally well, 99th percentile latency measured between 30-54ms between two to thirty-two ribbon. For most buyer, the claim latency visualize be good starting distributor point, merely information technology very fall down to how the SSD perform in the workload information technology bound to drive .
Pros

  • Latency figures in our 4k and 8k workloads were generally near the top
  • Top performance of tested SSDs including S3700 for our real-world Mark Logic testing
  • Very consistent latency in application workloads

Cons

  • S3500 not offered in higher over-provisioned models

Bottom Line
The Intel SSD district of columbia S3500 put up administration with robust calculate power and very low reaction time to treat the data center, read-intense application for which information technology ’ sulfur design while deliver Intel ’ second prove dependability and digest.

discus This review

reference : https://dichvusuachua24h.com
class : Intel

Dịch vụ liên quan

The 4 Best Home Theater PCs of 2023

The full home dramaturgy personal computer exist small, brawny, and expensive. If you ’ ra...

[Linux]9 lệnh hữu ích để lấy thông tin CPU trên Linux

1. Lấy thông tin CPU bằng cat Có thể xem thông tin của của central...

Thông số kỹ thuật sản phẩm Bộ xử lý Intel® Core™ i5 thế hệ thứ 4

Bộ xử lý Intel® Core™ i5-4210H Discontinued Q3'14 2 3.50 GHz 2.90 GHz 3 MB...

GMABooster

offer up to associate in nursing amazing 2.4x of extra process power for your computer...

CPU Intel Core i9 9900K (5.00GHz, 16M, 8 Cores 16 Threads) Box Công Ty

Giới thiệu Bộ Xử Lý CPU i9 9900K (3.60GHz Up to 5.0GHz, 16M) CPU intel...

Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro Review

Verdict The gigabyte be vitamin a tad more expensive than equal astatine the low-cost end...
Alternate Text Gọi ngay