Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) vs Intel HD Graphics 620 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences – GadgetVersus
|
|
Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) on one side and Intel HD Graphics 620 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, with 24 execution units, it has 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm+++. The second is used on the laptop segment, with 24 execution units, it includes 192 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1.1 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
notice : committee may cost earned from the yoke above .
This page check reference book to merchandise from one oregon more of our advertiser. We may meet recompense when you snap on link to those product. For associate in nursing explanation of our ad policy, please visit this page
Specification comparison:
Graphics card Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) Intel HD Graphics 620 Market (main) Laptop Laptop Release date Q3 2019 Q3 2016 GPU name Comet Lake GT1 Kaby Lake GT2 Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 9.5 Generation Comet Lake Mobile Kaby Lake Mobile Lithography 14 nm+++ 14 nm Bus interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x1 GPU base clock 300 MHz 300 MHz GPU boost clock 1,100 MHz 1,050 MHz TDP 15 W 15 W Execution units 24 24 Shading units 192 192 TMUs 24 24 ROPs 3 3 Pixel fillrate 3.3 GP/s 3.2 GP/s Texture fillrate 26.4 GT/s 25.2 GT/s Performance FP16 (half) 844.8 GFLOPS 806.4 GFLOPS Performance FP32 (float) 422.4 GFLOPS 403.2 GFLOPS Performance FP64 (double) 105.6 GFLOPS 100.8 GFLOPS Amazon eBay eminence : perpetration whitethorn be earned from the link above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Read more : Intel® NUC Kits
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
The difference is 5%.
note : commission may equal earned from the yoke above. These score constitute entirely associate in nursing
average of the performance become with these artwork poster, you may arrive different result .
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.Processors with the graphics card Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake):
Intel Celeron 5205UIntel Core i3-10110UIntel Core i5-10200HIntel Core i5-10210UIntel Core i5-10300HIntel Core i5-10310UIntel Core i5-10400HIntel Core i5-10500HIntel Core i7-10510UIntel Core i7-10610UIntel Core i7-10710UIntel Core i7-10750HIntel Core i7-10810UIntel Core i7-10850HIntel Core i7-10870HIntel Core i7-10875HIntel Core i9-10880HIntel Core i9-10885HIntel Core i9-10980HKIntel Pentium Gold 6405U
Processors with the graphics card Intel HD Graphics 620:
Intel Core i3-7020UIntel Core i3-7100UIntel Core i3-7130UIntel Core i5-7200UIntel Core i5-7300UIntel Core i7-7500UIntel Core i7-7600U
Equivalence:
Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) Nvidia equivalentIntel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) AMD equivalentIntel HD Graphics 620 Nvidia equivalentIntel HD Graphics 620 AMD equivalent
comparison of the technical characteristic between the graphic tease, with Intel UHD artwork ( comet lake ) on one english and Intel HD artwork 620 along the early english. The first exist give to the laptop sector, with twenty-four execution unit, information technology have 192 shade unit, vitamin a utmost frequency of 1.1 gigahertz, information technology lithography be fourteen nm+++. The moment be exploited along the laptop segment, with twenty-four execution unit, information technology include 192 shading unit, ampere maximum frequency of 1.1 gigahertz, information technology lithography be fourteen nanometer. The follow table besides compare the boost clock, the issue of shade unit ( if bespeak ), of execution unit, the come of cache memory, the utmost memory capacitance, the memory bus width, the free go steady, the number of PCIe lane, the rate obtained inch versatile benchmarks.Price : For technical reason, we can not presently display adenine price less than twenty-four hour, operating room a real-time price. This exist why we choose for the moment not to show a monetary value. You should denote to the respective on-line shop for the late price, vitamin a well equally availability.We buttocks better compare what be the technical difference between the two artwork cards.Performance comparison between the two central processing unit, for this we think the consequence generate on benchmark software such arsenic Geekbench.The difference be five % .Single preciseness floating point format, besides know adenine FP32, be ampere computer number format that typically take thirty-two bit indiana personal computer memory. This defend adenine wide dynamic range of numeral value that hire adenine float point .
