Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs Intel HD Graphics P3000
comparative analysis of Intel HD artwork 4000 and Intel HD graphics P3000 videocards for all know characteristic in the following class : necessity, technical information, television output and port, compatibility, dimension and necessity, API support, memory, engineering. benchmark videocards performance analysis : PassMark – G3D mark, PassMark – G2D mark, Geekbench – OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 desktop – face signal detection ( mPixels/s ), CompuBench 1.5 desktop – ocean coat model ( Frames/s ), CompuBench 1.5 desktop – T-Rex ( Frames/s ), CompuBench 1.5 background – video recording composition ( Frames/s ), CompuBench 1.5 desktop – Bitcoin mining ( mHash/s ), GFXBench 4.0 – car chase Offscreen ( frame ), GFXBench 4.0 – manhattan ( frame ), GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex ( frame of reference ), GFXBench 4.0 – car chase Offscreen ( federal protective service ), GFXBench 4.0 – manhattan ( federal protective service ), GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex ( federal protective service ), 3DMark fire strike – graphic score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark – G3D Mark: 341 vs 287
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark – G2D Mark: 188 vs 82
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1300
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1300
| Launch date |
14 May 2012 vs 1 February 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology |
22 nm vs 32 nm |
| PassMark – G3D Mark |
341 vs 287 |
| PassMark – G2D Mark |
188 vs 82 |
| GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames) |
2392 vs 1300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps) |
2392 vs 1300 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz
| Core clock speed |
850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed |
1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD graphics 4000
GPU 2: Intel HD graphics P3000
| PassMark – G3D Mark |
|
|
| PassMark – G2D Mark |
|
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name |
Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
Intel HD Graphics P3000 |
| PassMark – G3D Mark |
341 |
287 |
| PassMark – G2D Mark |
188 |
82 |
| Geekbench – OpenCL |
543 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
8.712 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
155.638 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – T-Rex (Frames/s) |
0.931 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Video Composition (Frames/s) |
7.36 |
|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
12.009 |
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
754 |
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – Manhattan (Frames) |
1492 |
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames) |
2392 |
1300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 – Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
754 |
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – Manhattan (Fps) |
1492 |
|
| GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps) |
2392 |
1300 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike – Graphics Score |
0 |
|
Compare specifications (specs)
|
Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
Intel HD Graphics P3000 |
| Architecture |
Generation 7.0 |
Generation 6.0 |
| Code name |
Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Sandy Bridge GT2 |
| Launch date |
14 May 2012 |
1 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating |
1440 |
1450 |
| Type |
Laptop |
Desktop |
| Boost clock speed |
1050 MHz |
1350 MHz |
| Core clock speed |
650 MHz |
850 MHz |
| Floating-point performance |
33.6 gflops |
|
| Manufacturing process technology |
22 nm |
32 nm |
| Pipelines |
16 |
|
| Texture fill rate |
4.2 GTexel / s |
|
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
45 Watt |
|
| Transistor count |
1,200 million |
995 million |
| Display Connectors |
No outputs |
No outputs |
| Interface |
PCIe 1.0 x16 |
PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| DirectX |
11.1 (11_0) |
10.1 |
| OpenGL |
4.0 |
3.1 |
| Memory bus width |
64 / 128 Bit |
|
| Shared memory |
1 |
|
| Quick Sync |
|
|
