List of quantum processors – Wikipedia
Manufacturer |
Name/Codename/Designation |
Architecture |
Layout |
Socket |
Fidelity |
Qubits (Logical) |
Release date |
Quantum Volume
|
RIKEN
|
RIKEN |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
53 qb effective (64 total)[2]
|
2023
|
Google |
N/A |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
99.5%[3] |
20 qb |
2017
|
|
Google |
N/A |
Superconducting |
7×7 lattice |
N/A |
99.7%[3] |
49 qb[4] |
Q4 2017 (planned)
|
Google |
Bristlecone |
Superconducting transmon |
6×12 lattice |
N/A |
99% (readout) 99.9% (1 qubit) 99.4% (2 qubits) |
72 qb[5][6] |
marching music five, 2018
|
Google |
Sycamore |
Superconducting transmon |
9×6 lattice |
N/A |
N/A |
53 qb effective (54 total) |
2019
|
USTC |
Jiuzhang |
Photonics |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
76 qb[7][8] |
2020
|
USTC
|
Zuchongzhi |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
62 qb[9]
|
2020
|
Quandela
|
Ascella
|
Photonics
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
98.8% (1 qubit) 88.1% (2 qubits) 86.0% (3 qubits)
|
6 qb[10]
|
2022[11]
|
Xanadu
|
Borealis[12]
|
Photonics
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
216 qb[12]
|
2022[12]
|
Xanadu
|
X8 [13]
|
Photonics
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
8 qb
|
2020
|
Xanadu
|
X12
|
Photonics
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
12 qb
|
2020[13]
|
Xanadu
|
X24
|
Photonics
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
24 qb
|
2020[13]
|
IBM |
IBM Q 5 Tenerife |
Superconducting |
bow tie |
N/A |
99.897% (average gate) 98.64% (readout)
|
5 qb |
2016[3]
|
IBM
|
IBM Q 5 Yorktown
|
Superconducting
|
bow tie
|
N/A
|
99.545% (average gate) 94.2% (readout)
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Q 14 Melbourne
|
Superconducting
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
99.735% (average gate) 97.13% (readout)
|
14 qb
|
|
IBM |
IBM Q 16 Rüschlikon |
Superconducting |
2×8 lattice |
N/A |
99.779% (average gate) 94.24% (readout)
|
16 qb[14] |
may seventeen, 2017 (Retired: 26 September 2018)[15]
|
IBM |
IBM Q 17 |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
17 qb[14] |
may seventeen, 2017
|
IBM |
IBM Q 20 Tokyo |
Superconducting |
5×4 lattice |
N/A |
99.812% (average gate) 93.21% (readout)
|
20 qb[16] |
november ten, 2017
|
IBM
|
IBM Q 20 Austin
|
Superconducting
|
5×4 lattice
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
20 qb
|
(Retired: 4 July 2018)[15]
|
IBM |
IBM Q 50 prototype |
Superconducting transmon |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
50 qb[16] |
|
IBM |
IBM Q 53 |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
53 qb |
october 2019
|
IBM |
IBM Eagle |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
127 qb |
november 2021
|
IBM |
IBM Osprey |
Superconducting |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
433 qb |
november 2022
|
Intel |
17-Qubit Superconducting Test Chip |
Superconducting |
N/A |
40-pin cross gap |
N/A |
17 qb[17][18] |
october ten, 2017
|
Intel |
Tangle Lake |
Superconducting |
N/A |
108-pin cross gap |
N/A |
49 qb[19] |
january nine, 2018
|
Rigetti
|
8Q Agave
|
Superconducting
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
8 qb
|
june four, 2018[20]
|
Rigetti
|
16Q Aspen-1
|
Superconducting
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
16 qb
|
november thirty, 2018[20]
|
Rigetti |
19Q Acorn |
Superconducting transmon |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
19 qb[21] |
december seventeen, 2017
|
Rigetti |
Aspen-M-3 |
Superconducting transmon |
N/A |
N/A |
99.9% (Single-qubit gates) 94.7% (Two-qubit gates CZ) 95.1% (Two-qubit gates XY) |
80 qb[22] |
december two, 2022
|
IBM
|
IBM Armonk[23]
|
Superconducting
|
Single Qubit
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
1 qb
|
october sixteen, 2019
|
IBM
|
IBM Ourense[23]
|
Superconducting
|
T
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
july three, 2019
|
IBM
|
IBM Vigo[23]
|
Superconducting
|
T
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
july three, 2019
|
IBM
|
IBM London[23]
|
Superconducting
|
T
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
september thirteen, 2019
|
IBM
|
IBM Burlington[23]
|
Superconducting
|
T
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
september thirteen, 2019
|
IBM
|
IBM Essex[23]
|
Superconducting
|
T
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
september thirteen, 2019
|
IBM
|
IBM Athens [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Belem[24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV16
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Bogotá [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Casablanca [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7 qb
|
(Retired – March 2022)
|
IBM
|
IBM Dublin [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV64
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Guadalupe [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
16 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Kolkata
|
Superconducting
|
QV128
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Lima [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV8
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Manhattan [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
65 qb
|
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Montreal [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV128
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
128[26]
|
IBM
|
IBM Mumbai [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV128
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Paris [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Quito [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV16
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Rome [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Santiago [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Sydney [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
IBM
|
IBM Toronto [24]
|
Superconducting
|
QV32 [25]
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
27 qb
|
|
QuTech at TU Delft
|
Starmon-5
|
Superconducting
|
X configuration
|
|
97% (readout)[28]
|
5 qb
|
2020
|
Quantware
|
Soprano[34]
|
Superconducting
|
|
N/A
|
99.9% (single-qubit gates)
|
5 qb
|
july 2021
|
Quantware
|
Contralto[35]
|
Superconducting
|
|
N/A
|
99.9% (single-qubit gates)
|
25 qb
|
borderland seven, 2022[36]
|
Quantware
|
Tenor[37]
|
Superconducting
|
|
N/A
|
|
64 qb
|
February 23, 2023
|