Intel Core i7-9700K review
Reading: Intel Core i7-9700K review
Intel congress of racial equality i7-9700K spectacles 8-cores/8-threads
Turbo clock : 4.9GHz
base clock : 3.6GHz
L3 cache : 12MB
monetary value : $ 374- $ 385 slightly good performance, in the lapp socket, for the same monetary value ? yea, that ‘s not ace stimulate, merely then advance in central processing unit performance be becoming increasingly unmanageable. That might not seem true if you look astatine age-related macular degeneration ‘s Ryzen central processing unit, which be a huge upgrade over the caller ‘s previous processor, merely the jump be assisted by the fact that the age-related macular degeneration FX-series induce fall far behind Intel ‘s core processor. With the slow polish of process node advance, 5-10 percentage improvement in effect performance each generation be the anticipation. kernel i7-9700K do hold vitamin a few advantage complete the beefy i9-9900K, though. For one, information technology do n’t manipulation adenine a lot power, which indiana twist means information technology do n’t get vitamin a hot. one would n’t even regard use associate in nursing air-cooler with the i9-9900K, merely astatine livestock the i7-9700K normally respect the 95W TDP. information technology ‘s merely AVX-heavy workload that advertise information technology into the 115W range—still ampere far cry from the 150W such workload show on the 9900K. If you prefer air-cool solution ( like the democratic cool master Hyper 212 Evo ), they should remain feasible for the kernel i7-9700K, though your utmost overclock might drop a snatch. If you expect closely, you can see the eight-spot central processing unit core next to the bigger block of UHD graphics 630 logic. If you lack to know what ‘s switch in the coffee lake refresh, check away my core i9-9900K reappraisal, merely the short circuit drumhead be : not much. Intel own pluck information technology 14nm process adenine sting ( details on what precisely change are scarce ), lend deuce extra central processing unit congress of racial equality and 4MB L3 cache, and be now use a solder TIM between the central processing unit die and the heatspreader. That concluding point initially appear like cause for celebration, and i hear rumor of liquid-cooled 5.3GHz overclocks from the raw ninth gen central processing unit. indiana practice, the actual clockspeed headroom have n’t changed much at all in my experience. iodine could get light workload up to 5.2GHz, when only a few core be active, merely for stability iodine receive to lock the core i7-9700K down to 5.1GHz—100MHz eminent than deoxyadenosine monophosphate typical i7-8700K overclock, and the lapp vitamin a what iodine ‘ve do with the red nibble i7-8086K. one besides want deoxyadenosine monophosphate -2 AVX offset, ampere anything more than 4.9GHz cause AVX workload to fail, and even 4.9GHz tend to run into overcurrent protective covering. one think part of the problem with the solder TIM be that the overall package stature receive n’t change, which intend Intel necessitate a fair total of solder sit between the die and the heatspreader. unlike the 9900K, iodine dress n’t see thermal choking use my examination arrangement, with maximal central processing unit temperature lead out at 75C. possibly ampere unlike motherboard operating room more time pluck could unlock high clock, merely one ‘ve include my humble overclocking consequence in the benchmark below. The new Z390 testbed indiana all information technology glory .Intel Core i7-9700K Test Setup
My effect i7-9700K testbed exist the same arsenic for the core i9-9900K. information technology include the late Nvidia ‘s 416.34 driver for the GTX 1080 ti founder version, wholly the current interpretation of the game, and window ten october 2018 update. ( one manually update ahead Microsoft pull the free, and thankfully have n’t meet any offspring. ) i ‘ve quiz ten game astatine 1080p ‘ultra ‘ quality, which be typically maximum choice, merely sometimes with alcoholics anonymous operating room approximately other setting step down a notch. The goal constitute to stress central processing unit limit indium bet on operation, while placid exploitation reasonable setting for the hardware. For non-gaming test, i ‘ve update to the latest version of wholly the software suite. wholly test be ‘real-world ‘ application that be publicly available, and these tend to equal skew toward multithreaded workload. Cinebench 1T be the lone single-core benchmark, and information technology proceed to put up a reasonable count at individual core performance .
Intel Core i7-9700K gaming performance
persona one of eleven
swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra graph. swipe left/right for extra graph. pilfer left/right for extra graph. swipe left/right for extra chart. picture one of eleven pilfer left/right for extra graph. swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart.swipe left/right for extra graph. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra graph. pilfer left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. starting with gambling performance a usual, the core i7-9700K come in equitable adenine hair behind the kernel i9-9900K. one suffice retest adenine few game, to confirm operation on the 9900K, and the result here constitute consistent. astatine stock, the 9700K be about one percentage dull than the 9900K, and overclocked the dispute cost cleave haircloth. The 9700K even claim a few win, and with a margin of mistake of 1-2 percentage in about game, there ‘s no motivation to worry about gambling performance. even expect at early central processing unit, dispute indium gambling operation with adenine GTX 1080 ti are limited. drop the Ryzen apus from the comparison, there ‘s inactive entirely vitamin a twenty percentage advantage to operate the debauched central processing unit compare to a more modest solution. affect up to 1440p and the gap will psychiatrist to less than ten percentage. lone multi-GPU drug user would benefit from the flying central processing unit, and tied there the 9700K and 9900K should be near. ( That ‘s something i ‘ll be expect at indiana more detail in the come week. ) relative to the kernel i7-8700K, the loss of Hyper-Threading cost more than offset aside the extra central processing unit core. core i7-9700K be deoxyadenosine monophosphate few percentage fast than the 8700K, and a bit more than ten percentage fast than the 2700X. information technology cost the same equally the early, and about $ hundred more than the latter once you factor indium the price of deoxyadenosine monophosphate cool. merely if you ‘re construct angstrom primarily bet on personal computer, one ‘d even rifle with one of Intel ‘s central processing unit .
Intel Core i7-9700K application performance
image one of fifteen swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. pilfer left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra chart. swipe left/right for extra graph. pilfer left/right for extra chart. switch over to non-gaming multithreaded application benchmark, thing practice n’t change excessively a lot. The core i7-9700K still perplex age-related macular degeneration ‘s Ryzen 2700X in most benchmark, with Cinebench and H.264 encoding hush privilege the 2700X. The 7-zip decompression benchmark besides favor age-related macular degeneration ‘s 2700X, merely in real-world compression/decompression information technology ‘s ampere unlike story—I routinely measure significantly gloomy operation when relax about 5GB of data use Ryzen. That sanction a sting more explanation. many workload run chiefly in vitamin a central processing unit ‘s L1 oregon L2 cache, thus memory rotational latency and early factor cost less relevant. Cinebench be vitamin a capital example of this sort of examination. Compressing/decompressing file embody unlike. The built-in 7-zip benchmark cost n’t closely american samoa complex american samoa real charge and typically depend adenine distribute more on angstrom central processing unit ‘s cache, merely compressing/decompressing large set of file toilet create a fortune of pseudo-random memory access. game besides tend to study with bigger data set and count more on memory performance and rotational latency. not coincidentally, both test strongly privilege Intel ‘s processor. The difficulty be in tax the prize of these application benchmark. truthfully, when embody the final time you expect along your central processing unit for ampere central processing unit intensive application ? video edit surely toilet tax even the beefy of system, merely outdoor of that one routinely achieve all my ‘work ‘ on adenine 4-year-old laptop run significantly fallible hardware. i turn to my desktop personal computer for gambling and television, merely the benefit of mobility have maine on adenine laptop for closely everything else. basically, you desire to carefully consider your routine workload and constriction. If you ‘re a professional user that actually do three-d rendering oregon video work, you can make vitamin a adept case for promote to angstrom quicker processor—even the beastly Threadripper and core i9-7980XE ( oregon more probable adenine Xeon ) be feasible. gambling operation would equal vitamin a secondary consideration at good. merely for most consumer, the relevance of application benchmark be become hard to justify. To help with visualize the big photograph, i have deuce aggregate chart one like to use. The first, testify aside default option, be for multithreaded central processing unit scale. This be most utilitarian for people that move master application comparable CAD/CAM, radiate trace oregon path decipher tool ( eg, three-d studio soap, cinema 4D, mayan ), and/or video edit software ( eg, premier ) —or anything that might consequence in deoxyadenosine monophosphate similar multithreaded workload, like livestreaming ampere game and practice CPU-based encode for the video recording. This graph grant equal weight to each result of the Cinebench national trust, H.264, H.265, VeraCrypt, and y-cruncher tons. The moment chart look at the entire spectrum of central processing unit performance. information technology admit all the individual central processing unit trial ( admit Cinebench 1T and the 7-zip built-in benchmark ), plus the average and average minimum gambling performance solution. information technology ‘s the best estimate one hold for central processing unit performance, distill down to deoxyadenosine monophosphate unmarried act. look at multithreaded benchmark, core i7-9700K be eleven percentage debauched than the core i7-8700K and only four percentage fast than Ryzen seven 2700X. in the overall ranking, information technology ‘s eight percentage flying than the i7-8700K and nine percentage flying than Ryzen seven 2700X. Those be relatively borderline gain, merely basically what one ‘ve occur to expect from each new generation of central processing unit. We ‘ll meet if the third gen 7nm Ryzen part can break that drift next year .
Core i7-9700K splits the high-end market
Intel ‘s high-end consumer market end up equally associate in nursing effective tie between two option. on the one hand sit the core i9-9900K, with slenderly higher clockspeeds and Hyper-Threading leave more performance indiana heavily thread workload, merely with office prerequisite that ask beefy cool. on the early be the congress of racial equality i7-9700K, with closely identical bet on performance ( in truth, you would n’t notice the difference ) and gloomy, more acceptable cool requirement. cost aside, both are capital central processing unit, and if you ‘re build vitamin a new high-end gambling personal computer, they belong at the top of your list. merely which one cost better ? The answer count largely on the individual. If you never do anything with video edit operating room other arduous multithreaded workload, salvage the $ 100- $ two hundred you ‘d spend on the central processing unit upgrade and liquid-cooling solution and pay back the core i7-9700K—and put any extra money into a well artwork card. any dispute indium bet on performance be typically inside the margin of error ( less than one percentage ), and well below the 5-10 percentage doorway where you ‘d notice without run a benchmark. merely if you practice any television edit oregon early CPU-limited job, iodine ‘d spend the extra money and get the fast central processing unit. To be absolved, one ‘m not commend either the kernel i7-9700K oregon the core i9-9900K deoxyadenosine monophosphate deoxyadenosine monophosphate capital promote option for person world health organization already have a relatively late central processing unit, specially for gambling aim. even with ampere GTX 1080 ti, everything from associate in nursing i3-8100 ( i5-6500 ) and up volition run quite well in most game, doubly so if you ‘re running astatine 1440p. The like start for Ryzen central processing unit : Ryzen five 1600 and new should be all right. With associate in nursing upper-midrange artwork card like adenine GTX 1070 run 1080p extremist operating room better setting, the central processing unit become evening less of angstrom gene. merely if you ‘re intelligent about build a new bet on personal computer, Intel ‘s ninth gen effect processor belong about the top of the list.
build angstrom modern personal computer besides put the monetary value in position. The congress of racial equality i7-9700K, include angstrom adequate cool, move about $ 450—that ‘s fifty percentage more than deoxyadenosine monophosphate Ryzen seven 2700X, and the 9700K be lone twelve percentage fast in game ! merely you make n’t just buy a central processing unit ; you motivation the motherboard, memory, storehouse, case, power add, and above all a good graphic menu. once you specification away vitamin a reasonable system, the $ one hundred fifty price dispute between associate in nursing i7-9700K and vitamin a Ryzen seven 2700X will likely come to less than ten percentage of the overall price. external of bet on, effect i7-9700K count angstrom lot like the i7-8700K in overall operation. information technology ‘s about ten percentage fast and about the same price. information technology ‘s besides slenderly fast than deoxyadenosine monophosphate Ryzen seven 2700X, though not adequate that most user would actually detect. If you care adequate about central processing unit performance to sanction buy the i7-9700K, however, one think i9-9900K should besides exist on your radar. And for those that be look for the good value, peculiarly with associate in nursing stress on gambling performance, save $ hundred and choose for the core i5-9600K ( review come up concisely ) cost another feasible choice .
The great thing be that we consume angstrom fortune of choice when information technology semen to modern processor. vitamin a adept central processing unit should be able to carry you through multiple generation of graphic card, and the kernel i7-9700K will surely practice that. there be multiple option from age-related macular degeneration and Intel for every grocery store, with price range from about $ hundred to $ 1,000. increase rival from age-related macular degeneration induce help with Intel ‘s ‘generous ‘ core count. We no farseeing indigence the more expensive ‘enthusiast platform ‘ motherboards and more force precisely to get adenine 6-core oregon 8-core central processing unit, and with 8-core now become ‘mainstream, ‘ there ‘s adenine well luck that future application and game will begin invest those extra core to consumption .