Dịch Vụ Sửa Chữa 24h Tại Hà Nội

Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs Intel HD Graphics P3000

Intel HD Graphics 4000 vs Intel HD Graphics P3000

comparative analysis of Intel HD artwork 4000 and Intel HD graphics P3000 videocards for all know characteristic in the following class : necessity, technical information, television output and port, compatibility, dimension and necessity, API support, memory, engineering. benchmark videocards performance analysis : PassMark – G3D mark, PassMark – G2D mark, Geekbench – OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 desktop – face signal detection ( mPixels/s ), CompuBench 1.5 desktop – ocean coat model ( Frames/s ), CompuBench 1.5 desktop – T-Rex ( Frames/s ), CompuBench 1.5 background – video recording composition ( Frames/s ), CompuBench 1.5 desktop – Bitcoin mining ( mHash/s ), GFXBench 4.0 – car chase Offscreen ( frame ), GFXBench 4.0 – manhattan ( frame ), GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex ( frame of reference ), GFXBench 4.0 – car chase Offscreen ( federal protective service ), GFXBench 4.0 – manhattan ( federal protective service ), GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex ( federal protective service ), 3DMark fire strike – graphic score.

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark – G3D Mark: 341 vs 287
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark – G2D Mark: 188 vs 82
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1300
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1300
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 May 2012 vs 1 February 2011
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark – G3D Mark 341 vs 287
PassMark – G2D Mark 188 vs 82
GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames) 2392 vs 1300
GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps) 2392 vs 1300

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000

  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
Boost clock speed 1350 MHz vs 1050 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD graphics 4000
GPU 2: Intel HD graphics P3000

PassMark – G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
341
287
PassMark – G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
188
82
GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2392
1300
GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2392
1300
Name Intel HD Graphics 4000 Intel HD Graphics P3000
PassMark – G3D Mark 341 287
PassMark – G2D Mark 188 82
Geekbench – OpenCL 543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop – Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 – Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 754
GFXBench 4.0 – Manhattan (Frames) 1492
GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Frames) 2392 1300
GFXBench 4.0 – Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 754
GFXBench 4.0 – Manhattan (Fps) 1492
GFXBench 4.0 – T-Rex (Fps) 2392 1300
3DMark Fire Strike – Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 4000 Intel HD Graphics P3000

Essentials

Architecture Generation 7.0 Generation 6.0
Code name Ivy Bridge GT2 Sandy Bridge GT2
Launch date 14 May 2012 1 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1440 1450
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 1350 MHz
Core clock speed 650 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 33.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 16
Texture fill rate 4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,200 million 995 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16

API support

DirectX 11.1 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.0 3.1

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync
source : https://dichvusuachua24h.com
category : Intel